Updated · Volt Ghost team
Three hosts, numbered backwards
Read through Cloudflare's DNS-over-HTTPS resolver on 14 November 2026. All three QQ Mail domains returned the same set.
| Priority | Host | Addresses seen | Network (Team Cymru) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 (tried first) | mx3.qq.com | 1 IPv4, 1 IPv6 | Tencent, AS132203 |
| 20 | mx2.qq.com | 4 IPv4, 5 IPv6 | China Unicom (AS136958, AS135061) and China Telecom (AS58466) ranges |
| 30 (last resort) | mx1.qq.com | 1 IPv4, 2 IPv6 | Tencent, AS132203 |
The names run opposite to the priorities: mx3 carries the lowest number, so it is the preferred server and mx1 is the final fallback. Anyone who reads only the host names may assume mx1 is primary; the priority value is what counts. Every host has at least one IPv6 address, so an IPv6-only sender can still deliver. Large providers may answer differently depending on where you resolve from, so treat the counts above as one vantage point.
SPF and DMARC across the three domains
| Domain | SPF (apex TXT) | DMARC (_dmarc) |
|---|---|---|
qq.com | v=spf1 include:spf.mail.qq.com ~all | p=quarantine, reports to [email protected] |
vip.qq.com | same as qq.com | p=quarantine, same report address |
foxmail.com | same as qq.com | p=none, same report address |
- Nested SPF:
spf.mail.qq.compulls in seven further lists (three namedqq-a/b/c, four namedbiz-a/b/c/d) and ends in-all, while the apex records end in the softer~all. - No MTA-STS or TLS-RPT: none of the three domains published
_mta-stsor_smtp._tlsrecords, unlike Gmail, so senders are not told to insist on TLS. - Mixed DMARC: a forged foxmail.com sender gets the lighter treatment. If you filter on DMARC results, expect foxmail.com failures to arrive flagged rather than quarantined.
When these records matter
QQ addresses show up on sign-up forms from China and from overseas Chinese users. If a confirmation or one-time code to an @qq.com address never arrives, the bounce or deferral normally names one of the three hosts above; mail that is accepted but never shown is usually sitting in the recipient's spam folder. Our verification code not received checklist covers both cases. A custom business domain whose MX ends in .qq.com is on Tencent's hosted mail; the email host lookup now labels that as QQ Mail (Tencent).
QQ Mail and disposable-address checks
An MX-based filter sees Tencent's own servers and lets qq.com through, which is right: it is a permanent mailbox. Throwaway domains look different. 365boxmail.com, for example, has a single MX pointing at generator.email, a host shared by hundreds of listed temp mail domains. For the other signals sites use, read how sites detect disposable email, or test one address with the disposable email checker. China's other big free provider is covered on our NetEase (163.com) MX records page.
Questions
What is the MX record for qq.com?
qq.com publishes three MX records: mx3.qq.com at priority 10, mx2.qq.com at 20 and mx1.qq.com at 30. Senders try mx3 first, because the lowest number wins.
Does foxmail.com use the same mail servers as qq.com?
Yes. On 14 November 2026 foxmail.com and vip.qq.com listed the same three hosts at the same priorities, and all three domains use the same SPF include.
Why is qq.com's DMARC policy different from foxmail.com's?
They are separate DNS names, so each can set its own policy. qq.com and vip.qq.com ask receivers to quarantine failing mail (p=quarantine); foxmail.com only asks for reports (p=none).
Is qq.com a disposable email domain?
No. QQ Mail accounts are long-term mailboxes tied to a QQ account. qq.com, foxmail.com and vip.qq.com are not on the open-source throwaway-domain list our checker reads.
